Legal Opinion

Sugarland Industries v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided April 5, 1929No. Docket No. 25063PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1268OPINION.

Milliken :

Petitioner assigns as error the refusal of the respondent to allow as a deduction, pursuant to section 234(a)(1) of the Revenue Act of 1918, the sum of $100,000 which was contributed in the year 1920 to the Laura Eldridge Hospital Association. Congress, unlike in the case of individuals (section 214), has not allowed as deductions contributions made by corporations, and for the contribution here in question to be allowed as a deduction we must find that the same bore a direct relation, with consequent direct benefits, to the business of petitioner. Section 234 enumerates…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clark Thread Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
  2. Adam, Meldrum & Anderson Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
  3. Duggan v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1930
  4. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931
  5. Sugarland Indus. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API