Legal Opinion

Follis v. Brinkman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1957No. 34232Published

1Opinion of the Court

51 Wn.2d 310 (1957)

317 P.2d 1061

WILLIAM T. FOLLIS et al., Respondents,

v.

E.J. BRINKMAN, Appellant.[1]

No. 34232.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One.

November 21, 1957.

Livesey, Kingsbury & Livesey and T.B. Asmundson, for appellant.

R.W. Greene, David E. Rhea, and Joseph H. Smith, for respondents.

2Per curiam

In this action, the plaintiffs sought:(1) A judicial determination of the existence of an oral partnership dealing in real estate;(2) An accounting of the profits of the alleged partnership; and(3) Enforcement of an alleged oral agreement between Messrs. Follis and Brinkman, requiring the…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McUne v. FuquaWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Bystrom v. PurkeyWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Follis v. BrinkmanWashington Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API