Legal Opinion

Lake Shore National Bank v. Coyle

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 27, 1968No. Civ. 66-C-1002PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment

MAROYITZ, District Judge.

This is a tax refund case, in which plaintiffs seek to recover certain alleged over-payments of estate taxes in the amount of $82,942.71 and interest, for the benefit of the estate of Arthur Luster, deceased. The plaintiffs, Lake Shore National Bank and Melvin R. Luster, are co-executors of Arthur Luster’s will.

The parties have submitted cross-motions for summary judgment. A stipulation of uncontested factshas been filed with the Court, and it appears that legal issues are all that remain. This Court entered an order…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Wagner v. WagnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Estate of Floyd B. Faulkerson, Deceased, Berniece E. Faulkerson, Administratrix v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
  4. Harman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1944
  5. Keith v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. American Nurseryman Publishing Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
  2. Stansbury v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
  3. LaSalle National Bank v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
  4. Lake Shore National Bank v. CoyleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  5. American Nurseryman Publishing Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API