Legal Opinion · Dissent

A.O. v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 25, 1997No. 96-1769Published

1DissentDauksch, Judge

I respectfully dissent.

It is well established that an appellate court is prohibited from substituting its judgment for that of an administrative agency in assessing the weight of the evidence or resolving disputed factual issues. § 120.68(10), Fla. Stat. (1993). See McKinney v. Castor, 667 So.2d 387 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Carreras v. Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Ass’n, 665 So.2d 1082 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Rosmond v. Unemployment Appeals Com’n, 651 So.2d 233 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). The relevant inquiry on appeal is whether the agency’s findings are supported by competent…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. LEAF v. ClarkSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  2. Kelle v. DH Holmes Co., Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Dept. of Health & Rehab. Services v. S.Supreme Court of Florida · 1995
  4. Rosmond v. Unemployment Appeals Com'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  5. K.M.T. v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API