Legal Opinion

Saiya v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 4, 1995No. 84412PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SHAW, Justice.

We have for review Saiya v. State, 641 So.2d 975 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994), wherein the district court rejected a constitutional challenge to the validity of section 784.048(4), Florida Statutes (1993), Florida’s anti-stalking statute, based on several cases including Bouters v. State, 634 So.2d 246 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). We granted review because Bouters was pending before this Court. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

We have since issued a decision in Bouters upholding the constitutionality of the anti-stalking statute. See Bouters v. State, No. 83,558, — So .2d —…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bouters v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. Bouters v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Saiya v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Folsom v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API