Legal Opinion · Dissent

Annerton v. Bates

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 2, 1994No. AV93000569Published

1DissentThigpen, Judge

The ore tenus rule affords a presumption of correctness to the trial court’s judgment in this case. My review of the record discloses evidence supporting the trial court’s determination, and I would affirm its judgment; therefore, I must respectfully dissent.

The February 1993 order granting temporary custody to the paternal grandparents was based upon an agreement that, at that time, the best interests of the children would be served by placing their custody with the Annertons because the mother and the father had been arrested and faced possible incarceration.

In this proceeding, the mother…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte McLendonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API