Legal Opinion
Rush v. Savchuk
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 21, 1980No. 78-952PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court 1
444 U.S. 320 (1980)
RUSH ET AL.
v.
SAVCHUK.
No. 78-952.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued October 3, 1979.
Decided January 21, 1980.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA.
O. C. Adamson II argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs was James F. Roegge.
Edward H. Borkon argued the cause and filed a brief for appellee.
2Opinion of the Court · MarshallJustice Marshall
This appeal presents the question whether a State may constitutionally exercise quasi in rem jurisdiction over a defendant who has no forum contacts by attaching the contractual obligation of an insurer licensed to do business in the State to defend and indemnify him…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited38 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of San Francisco CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016