Legal Opinion
Danielle Santomenno v. John Hancock Life Insurance Co
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 16, 2012No. 11-2520Published
1Opinion of the Court
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 11-2520 ____________ DANIELLE SANTOMENNO, for the use and benefit of the John Hancock Trust and the John Hancock Funds II; KAREN POLEY and BARBARA POLEY, for the use and benefit of the John Hancock Funds II; DANIELLE SANTOMENNO, KAREN POLEY and BARBARA POLEY individually and on behalf of Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA"), employee benefit plans that held, or continue to hold, group variable annuity contracts issued/sold by John Hancock Life Insurance Life Insurance Company…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- California v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.