Legal Opinion

Sequel Capital Corp. v. Airship International Ltd.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 12, 1993No. 92 C 7794PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge:

Before the court are the motions of defendants Airship International Ltd. (“A.I.L.”), Louis J. Pearlman (“Pearlman”), and Anheu-ser-Busch Companies, Inc. (“Anheuser-Busch”) to dismiss portions of plaintiff Sequel Capital Corporation’s (“Sequel”) amended complaint. For the reasons stated below, the court grants the motion of A.I.L. and Pearlman and denies the motion of Anheu-ser-Busch. Sequel is granted leave to file an amended complaint within ten days.

FACTS

The complaint establishes that Sequel is in the business of providing financing to entities which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bankers Trust Company, Cross-Appellee v. Old Republic Insurance Company, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. UniQuality, Inc. v. Infotronx, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  3. Skycom Corporation and Gerald M. Walters v. Telstar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  4. Kennedy v. Deere & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. Kennedy v. Deere & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Edalatdju v. Guaranteed Rate, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
  2. Apex Automotive Warehouse, L.P. v. WSR Corp. (In Re Apex Automotive Warehouse, L.P.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  3. Tara Brands LLC v. Vaimo, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API