Legal Opinion

Rosa v. Mohan Kulkarni Unibell Anesthesia, P.C.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1982PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*40OPINION OF THE COURT

Ira Gammerman, J.

In the first three of these motions (Rosa, Bleich and Gold) defendant movants seek order directing that each of the instant matters be referred to a medical malpractice panel pursuant to section 148-a of the Judiciary Law. In each case, the court at a prepanel conference, ruled that the case should proceed to trial without being submitted to such a panel and suggested to counsel a motion seeking the relief requested herein. In the fourth motion (Wolitzky) plaintiff asks that his case be set down for trial without being submitted to a section 148-a panel.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Comiskey v. ArlenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. Comiskey v. ArlenNew York Court of Appeals · 1977

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gold v. HersheyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. King v. RetzNew York Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Stone v. Buffalo General HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Rosa v. KulkarniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API