Legal Opinion

Mahaney v. Penman

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided October 15, 1854PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion for a new trial. The action was brought by Mahaney against three defendants, upon a judgment rendered in his favor against them in the State of Virginia. The grounds of the motion sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Hoeeman, J.,

(with concurrence of Oakley, C. J. and Duer, J.)—On the 22d of April, 1850, the plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defendants, in a court, described as the *35a Circuit Superior Court of Law and Chancery, for Frederick County, in the State of Virginia,” for §800, with legal interest, until paid, and his costs.

The plaintiff avers in his complaint, that such court was a Court of Record of the State of Virginia; that he is the owner of the judgment, and that the defendant is indebted to him the sum of $800, with interest, for which he prays judgment.

The defendant, Daniel Penman,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Varick v. DodgeNew York Court of Chancery · 1841

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Allen v. MalcolmNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1872
  2. Spyer v. C. J. FisherThe Superior Court of New York City · 1874

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API