Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. Public Service Commission

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided August 25, 1925PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODSON, J.-

This proceeding was instituted before the Public Service Commission by complainant, and had for its purpose the prevention of the promulgation and enforcement of certain rules and regulations proposed by the Kansas City Power & Light Company, called the relator or appellant, regarding the kind and character of fuse and switch box which prospective consumers of electricity in Kansas City should install as a condition precedent to being supplied with an electric current by the Power Company.

It may be proper to state that a fuse or switch box is the covering or enclosure for switches…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United States Ex Rel. Pitcairn Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. State ex rel. Wabash Railroad v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  3. State ex rel. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  4. Southwest Missouri Railroad v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  5. State ex rel. Croy v. Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Davis v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. State Ex Rel. Chicago Great Western Railroad v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  3. State Ex Rel. City of Kirkwood v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  4. Wiegand v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Perkins v. TraskMontana Supreme Court · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API