Shade v. Shade
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, Justice.
“Dies Dominicus non est jurisdicus” — the Lord’s Day is not a court day— is a recognized maximum of the common law and “there is no provision in our Constitution, or any enactment of our Legislature, which, by implication, or expressly, in the letter or spirit of it, abrogates this rule.” Haynes v. Sledge, 2 Port. 530, 531, 27 Am.Dec. 665; Reid v. State, 53 Ala. 402, 25 Am.Rep. 627; Jemison v. Howell, 230 Ala. 423, 161 So, 806, 99 A.L.R. 1511.
Consonant with the maxim, it is generally declared that except ais otherwise prescribed by statute, no judicial proceeding, as…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sweeney v. TritschSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- Craig v. RootSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Chamblee v. ColeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
- Koch v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Baxley v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- City of Mobile v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
- Ex Parte SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Calhoun v. CalhounCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970
- Arnold v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.