Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Glafenhein

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 6, 1993No. 9224SC698PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREENE, Judge.

Defendant Gene Manning d/b/a Manning Tractor, Truck and Equipment (Manning) appeals from an order filed on 23 March 1992, denying Manning’s motions to dismiss plaintiffs complaint and defendant Sylvia J. Glafenhein’s cross-claims on the grounds of lack of in personam jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

The facts pertinent to this appeal are as follows: On 10 July 1989, Herbert Glafenhein (Mr. Glafenhein) purchased a trailer from defendant Manning’s place of business in Sevierville, Tennessee. On 27 August 1989, Mr. Glafenhein, using the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Dillon v. Numismatic Funding Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Tom Togs, Inc. v. Ben Elias Industries Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Cherry Bekaert & Holland v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bruggeman v. Meditrust Acquisition Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Filmar Racing, Inc. v. StewartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Replacements, Ltd. v. MidwesterlingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Better Business Forms, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  5. Tejal Vyas, LLC v. Carriage Park Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API