Legal Opinion

Bechtel v. Marshall

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1918No. 11869PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Writ oe Error to the Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on writ of error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. David F. MatchE^t, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chiee Justice Carter

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an action in assumpsit on a' promissory note given by plaintiff in error, dated February 1, 1908, payable one day after date to the order of H. H. Bechtel, for $16,125.65, with six- per cent interest. Plaintiff in error pleaded the general issue, that the note was practically without consideration, or that there was a partial failure of consideration. At the close of the evidence in the trial court counsel for defendant in error moved for a directed verdict, which motion was granted by the court, and the jury were instructed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Woodman v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Bailey v. RobisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Cumbey v. LovettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  4. Schuchmann v. KnoebelIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
  5. People v. Estate of LefensIllinois Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Elsberry Equipment Co. v. ShortAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  2. Union Bank v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1932
  3. Gray v. McDougalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  4. Judd v. SuttonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940
  5. Silliman v. NowlanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API