Legal Opinion

Sweeney v. Farrington

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1963PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

William R. Beenxax, Jr., J.

Both sides move for summary judgment in this taxpayer’s action brought pursuant to section 51 of the General Municipal Law. The complaint seeks a judgment declaring certain items in the 1963 budget of the Town of Hempstead illegal and enjoining the defendants from levying and collecting such portions of the 1963 town highway tax as are attributable to the alleged illegal items.

Such facts as are before the court are not in dispute. Sometime prior to October 30, 1962, the town officials, pursuant to law, formulated the preliminary 1963 budget and provided for a public…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Maurice O'Meara Co. v. National Park BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Altschul v. . LudwigNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Wells v. . Town of SalinaNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Western New York Water Co. v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. People v. TremaineNew York Court of Appeals · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Blaikie v. LindsayNew York Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Wein v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API