Legal Opinion

Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. Brady

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1929No. 5092PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

Respondent purchased a tractor from appellant in May, 1925, giving in payment three notes secured by a chattel mortgage. The first note was dne in November, 1925. Default having been made in its payment and by the terms of the notes the entire amount having thereby become due, appellant sought, by notice and sale, to foreclose the chattel mortgage and thereafter brought this action to recover a deficiency judgment.

Respondent in his answer set out three affirmative defenses and also counterclaimed on three causes of action. For a first defense he alleged that the chattel mortgage had not been…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Swank v. ElwertOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Unfried v. LibertIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Garrett v. SoucieIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Marchand v. RonaghanIdaho Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Jones v. HornSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Hailey National BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Ossmen v. Commercial Credit Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Poitevin v. Refund Cash Grocery, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API