Legal Opinion

Montague v. Reakert

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 7, 1869PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Case 25 — PETITION ORDINARY — (Brief misplaced.)

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE ROBERTSON

delivered the opinion oe the court.

After the dissolution, and notice of it to the appellees, Parker had no authority to bind his former co-partner Montague by the note in the firm name, even though executed for a firm debt. The law implies in such a case no authority, and the testimony clearly negatives any express authority; consequently the verdict and judgment against Montague were unauthorized and erroneous, and the court ought to have sustained the motion for a new *394trial. This opinion may not affect Montague’s pre-existing liability on the open account.

Wherefore the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Terrell v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
  2. Fields v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1877
  3. Pace v. H. B. Claflin & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API