Ludy v. Larsen
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from a decree of tbe former chancellor, advised by Vice-Chancellor Howell.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Pitney, Chancellor.
This is an appeal from a decree made in an interpleader suit, whereby the fund in court was disposed of. The ground of the appeal is that the claim of one John W. R. Maginnis (assigned to Rufus Booye, the appellant) was disallowed.
It appears that the complainant, Ludy, entered into a contract with a firm of Larsen & Son, whereby they agreed to furnish the materials and do the work of altering and adding to a building owned by the complainant; that the contract was duly placed on file, and that thereafter, while money was in Ludy’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Carleton v. . Lombard, Ayres Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Parr v. State ex rel. CockeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
- Elliott v. HaydenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Potter v. ClappIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
- City of Rochester v. . MontgomeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McGregor v. Provident Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Biddle v. BiddleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
- The Century Indemnity Co. v. NorbutNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
- Faitoute v. WrightSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
- Rizzi v. PohanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926