Kripp v. Luton
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CASSELL, District Judge.
This case requires us to determine when the statute of limitations begins to run for federal civil rights actions challenging a law enforcement seizure and subsequent forfeiture of property. The district court below dismissed appellant Paul Kripp’s complaint challenging the seizure and forfeiture of property he alleges is his. The district court found that he filed all of his causes of action outside the time prescribed by the applicable statutes of limitations because they all accrued when law enforcement seized his property, not later when the forfeiture proceedings…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Owens v. OkureSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Kenneth Ray Meade v. Grubbs, Badge No. 128, Individually and as a Deputy Sheriff of the County of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Rotella v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Jerome Singleton v. City of New York, Ronald Salzer and Anthony DellaventuraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- McCarty v. GilchristCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Ullery v. BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Weldon v. Ramstad-HvassCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Matthews v. WileyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2010
- Douglas v. MillerDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2012
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.