Legal Opinion

Diaz v. Romer

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided June 12, 1992No. Civ. A. 77-C-1093, 90-C-340 and 88-C-1335PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CARRIGAN, District Judge.

The matter is before the Court on the parties’ joint motion for approval of the settlement agreements submitted in the above captioned cases. Because these cases involve certified classes, the Court must approve any resolution of the outstanding claims of the plaintiff classes under Rule 23(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

INTRODUCTION

The proposed settlement agreements filed in these cases would settle three class action lawsuits challenging the conditions of confinement in seven Colorado prisons: Womens, Territorial, Shadow Mountain, Centennial,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Wilson v. SeiterSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County JailSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City Public Schools v. DowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Ramos v. LammDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hayes v. MarriottCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. Hayes v. MarriottCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  3. Taifa v. BayhDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API