Legal Opinion

Cariker v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided September 28, 2011No. CA 11-529PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFF HOOFMAN, Judge.

| Appellants David and Laura Cariker have filed separate briefs on appeal from an order terminating their parental rights to their child, B.C. Laura argues that DHS failed to provide reasonable services to achieve the goal of reunification and that she made measurable progress toward remedying the conditions that caused removal. David’s attorney has filed a no-merit brief. We affirm the termination of both parents’ parental rights.

On November 20, 2008, DHS took emergency custody of B.C., then age six, due to failure to protect, inadequate supervision, and mental injury.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Tadlock v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  3. Fredrick v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Landis-Maynard v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API