Legal Opinion

O'KEEFE v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 17, 2010No. 4D09-1414PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.

After the conclusion of closing argument in appellant’s trial for organized fraud, the trial court changed the instruction on the elements of the crime, from an instruction requiring the jury to find that the appellant and his co-defendant engaged in a scheme to defraud, to an instruction requiring that the jury find that the appellant and/or his co-defendant engaged in a scheme to defraud. Because appellant had relied on the prior instruction in his argument to the jury, we conclude that the error requires reversal.

Appellant and his co-defendant were charged by amended information with…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Ivory v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  3. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
  4. Welsh v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  5. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API