Legal Opinion
Permanence Corporation v. Kennametal, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 19, 1990No. 89-1872PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant, Permanence Corp., appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to defendant-appellee, Kennametal, Inc., holding that defendant did not have an implied best efforts obligation in the contract between Permanence and Kennametal. 725 F.Supp. 907. For the following reasons, we affirm.
I
Permanence is a closely-held Michigan corporation, which was formed by its president and majority shareholder Charles S. Baum in 1969 for the purpose of developing and exploiting certain processes developed by Baum. In the 1970s Permanence conducted research…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Perma Research & Development v. The Singer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Pinney Dock And Transport Co. v. Penn Central Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Hml Corporation v. General Foods CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Dan Beraha, M.D. v. Baxter Health Care CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Emerson Radio Corp. v. Orion Sales, Inc. Otake Trading Co. Ltd. Technos Development Limited Shigemasa Otake John Richard BondCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Flight Concepts Ltd. Partnership v. Boeing Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- Albers v. Edelson Technology Partners L.P.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Velsicol Chemical Corp. v. Enenco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.