Legal Opinion

Collins v. City of Keokuk

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 7, 1899PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Lee District Court. — How. II. Bakic, Jr., Judge. This is a proceeding by certiorari. A demurrer to. the petition was sustained, and, the plaintiff failing to plead further, judgment was rendered agaist him for costs, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBobiNSON, C. J.

The petition alleges that the plaintiff is a resident and taxpayer of the city of Keokuk, and a consumer of water; that in June 1877, the council of the defendant city of Keokuk passed an ordinance which authorized the defendant, the Keokuk Waterworks Company, to establish and maintain waterworks within the city for the period of twenty years; that the company constructed and established such works and maintained them, and supplied the city and its citizens with water, until the ninth day of October, 1896, when the council passed another ordinance, which took effect on the first day of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McHenry v. SneerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  2. Welch v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  3. Smith v. YoramSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  4. Iowa News Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  5. Iske v. City of NewtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Reed v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. In Re Acquisition of Flying Cloud AirportSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Achey v. City of MarionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Hamilton v. Mendota Coal & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  5. Keely v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API