Legal Opinion

Larson v. Sexsmith

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 3, 1912No. Gen. No. 16,776Published

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. IIenby C. Beitler, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1910.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fitch

This writ of error is brought to reverse a judgment entered in the Municipal Court against plaintiff in error for $117.25.

In September, 1909, the parties hereto entered into a written contract, by the terms of which Larson agreed “to furnish all material and labor for the painting and decorating of a six-flat building for Miss Doyle, being erected on Winthrop avenue, north of Leland avenue, for the sum of $500, payable 85 per cent, as work progresses, balance thirty days after completion of job.” Sexsmith, a contractor, was erecting a building for the Miss Doyle mentioned in the agreement.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ball v. BenjaminIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Razor v. RazorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API