Legal Opinion

Finocchiaro v. Finocchiaro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 14, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: We conclude that petitioner failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that respondent committed a family offense enumerated in Family Court Act § 812. The circumstances surrounding respondent’s actions toward petitioner fail to demonstrate either the requisite element of intent to harass (see, Penal Law former § 240.25; People v Moyer, 27 NY2d 252, 253; cf., Matter of Holcomb v Holcomb, 176 AD2d 409) or that respondent intentionally committed an act which placed petitioner in fear of imminent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. MoyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. People v. VazquezCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1987
  3. Holcomb v. HolcombAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Petkovsek v. SnyderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Eileen W. v. Mario A.New York City Family Court · 1996
  3. Petkovsek v. SnyderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API