Finocchiaro v. Finocchiaro
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: We conclude that petitioner failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that respondent committed a family offense enumerated in Family Court Act § 812. The circumstances surrounding respondent’s actions toward petitioner fail to demonstrate either the requisite element of intent to harass (see, Penal Law former § 240.25; People v Moyer, 27 NY2d 252, 253; cf., Matter of Holcomb v Holcomb, 176 AD2d 409) or that respondent intentionally committed an act which placed petitioner in fear of imminent…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. MoyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- People v. VazquezCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1987
- Holcomb v. HolcombAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by3 opinions
- Petkovsek v. SnyderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Eileen W. v. Mario A.New York City Family Court · 1996
- Petkovsek v. SnyderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998