Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Myers

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 21, 2014PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

WECHT, J.:

Matthew Myers challenges the judgment of sentence entered on October 4, 2012. For the reasons that follow, we affirm Myers’ judgment of sentence, but remand for further proceedings concerning Myers’ bail status.

The trial court has provided the following account of the factual history underlying Myers’ conviction:

On May 13, 2011, [Myers’] Cadillac De-Ville was towed to Pep Boys in Exton, Pennsylvania, at the request of [Myers]. A new alternator was installed in [Myers’] vehicle and an extended warranty was sold with the alternator. The total cost for work and labor was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CastilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. EichingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. BruceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Commonwealth v. TruesdaleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Commonwealth v. OckenhouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Com. v. Acosta, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Com. v. Bagley, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Com. v. Battle, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Com. v. Guzman, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. Com. v. Lawrence, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API