Legal Opinion
Rohm and Haas Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided December 12, 1978No. Civ. A. 78-384PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LATCHUM, Chief Judge.
This action is before the Court on defendant Mobil Oil Corporation’s (“Mobil”) motion for a stay pending decision by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”,) on Mobil’s application for reissue of the patent in suit. The parties have briefed and argued the motion and this Memorandum Opinion addresses their contentions.
Plaintiff, Rohm and Haas Company (“Rohm & Haas”), filed this action on September 11,1978, against the defendant, Mobil, seeking a declaratory judgment that Mobil’s United States Letters Patent No. 3,979,437 (“437 patent”) is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fisher Controls Co., Inc. v. Control Components, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1977
- PIC, Inc. v. Prescon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rohm & Haas Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981
- Johnson & Johnson, Inc. v. Wallace A. Erickson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- GPAC, Inc. v. D.W.W. Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- Pic Inc. v. Prescon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1980
- Rohm and Haas Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.