Legal Opinion
In re Mirena IUS Levonorgestrel-Related Products Liability Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided April 6, 2017No. MDL No. 2767PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TRANSFER ORDER
Sarah S. Vance, Chair
Before the Panel:*. Plaintiffs in 10 actions move under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize pretrial proceedings in this litigation in the Southern District of Mississippi or, alternatively, the Western District of Missouri or the District of New, Jersey. This litigation currently consists of 113 actions pending in 17 districts, as listed on Schedules A and B.1 Since the filing of the motion, the Panel has been notified of 37 related federal actions.2 This litigation involves alleged intracranial hypertension injuries caused by the hormonal component of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re Fluoroquinolone Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2015
- In re Lipitor (Atorvastatin Calcium) Marketing, Salespractices & Products Liability Litigation (No. II)United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2014
- In re Bair Hugger Forced Air Warming Devices Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2015
- In re Mirena IUS Levonorgestrel-Related Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2014
3Cited by2 opinions
- The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania V. Exxon Mobil CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- Treehouse Foods, Inc. v. Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2021