Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 30, 1992No. C2-92-40PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

Appellant Mary Karen Schmidt was arrested for driving while under the influence of alcohol, and her driver’s license was revoked by the Commissioner of Public Safety in accordance with the implied consent law. She thereafter filed a petition for judicial review, and sought rescission of the revocation.

At a district court hearing, Schmidt argued the officer’s stop of her vehicle was not lawful; the officer did not have probable cause to invoke the implied consent law and require her to take a chemical test; and she was denied or prevented by the officer from taking an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McDonnell v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  2. Frost v. COM'R OF PUBLIC SAFETY FOR STATECourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Theel v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Short v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hotchkiss v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API