Ross v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
1DissentPolston, J.
After holding an evidentiary hearing that produced more than 1,000 pages of transcript, the trial court found that the police officers in this case did not deliberately withhold Miranda warnings. This finding of fact is supported by competent substantial evidence in the record. Because of this finding of fact, the standard enunciated in Oregon v. Elstad, 470 U.S. 298, 105 S.Ct. 1285, 84 L.Ed.2d 222 (1985), applies here. The majority’s holding is contrary to the well-settled Florida law that Elstad applies in these circumstances. See, e.g., Davis v. State, 990 So.2d 459, 466 (Fla.2008). Under…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Missouri v. SeibertSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.