Legal Opinion

Fort v. Cameron & Moore

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 15, 1881No. 1585, Op. Book No. 2, p. 374Published

Appeal from Lamar County.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Quinan, J.

§1112. Liquidated damages;penalty. Appellants contracted to build appellee a house, and to finish the same within a specified time, or, in default thereof, to pay $10 per day for every day the building remained unfinished after the time specified for its completion. Held, the intention of the parties manifestly was that the $10 per day should be considered as liquidated damages. What,, the damages were which, upon a failure to complete the-building in time, Port might suffer, would have been um-certain and difficult of computation. Here no sum in *626gross is fixed, but a rate…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Durst v. SwiftTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  2. Madden v. ShapardTexas Supreme Court · 1848
  3. Mott v. MottNew York Supreme Court · 1851
  4. Mayer, Trustee v. WHITE, ADM.Supreme Court of the United States · 1861

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API