Legal Opinion

Whyte v. Christensen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1976No. 14151PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice:

Plaintiffs, David Whyte and his sons, David B., Dan and Terry, brought suit to recover wages for construction work they performed on home of the defendants, the Deri Christensens. The principal ground of defense was that the plaintiff was acting as a contractor without a license and thus precluded from collecting.1 Defendants also counterclaimed for damages of $1,000 alleging failure to do the work in a proper and workmanlike manner. A jury found the issues in favor of the plaintiffs for wages in the sum of $1,599.60 and rejected defendants’ counterclaim. From a judgment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Charlton v. HackettUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Wilson v. GardnerUtah Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Eklund v. ElwellUtah Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Plewe Const. Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Lyman v. TaylorUtah Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RubenUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Nelson v. WattsUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Cardon v. BrenchleyUtah Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API