Legal Opinion

In Re AW

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 24, 1990No. 89-15PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

569 A.2d 168 (1990)

In re A.W.

Appeal of A.W. a/k/a D.M.

No. 89-15.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Submitted September 19, 1989.

Decided January 24, 1990.

Beth Goodman, Washington, D.C., appointed by this court, was on the brief, for appellant.

Sumner J. Katz, appointed by this court, was on the brief, for appellee.

Frederick D. Cooke, Jr., Corp. Counsel at the time the statement was filed, Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, and Charlotte M. Brookins, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Washington, D.C., filed a statement in lieu of brief, for appellee District of Columbia.

Before ROGERS, Chief Judge,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. In re A.B.E.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. In re A.W.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. In re C. A. P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Appeal of U.S.W.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re M.F.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API