Legal Opinion

Willingham v. Buckeye Cotton Oil Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 25, 1913No. 4418PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal; from Richmond superior court — Judge H. C. Hammond. August 16, 1912.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

1. The agent of a corporation is not, by reason of his agency, disqualified to become its surety upon an appeal bond. If he be solvent, his relation to his principal would not in any way diminish the right or power of the appellee to recover upon the bond.

*254Decided August 25, 1913. Appeal; from Richmond superior court — Judge H. C. Hammond. August 16, 1912. W. E. Miller, for plaintiff. Bryan Gumming, for defendant.

2. An appeal is an investigation de novo. Patterson v. Sams, 2 Ga. App. 756 (59 S. E. 18); Abrams v. Lang, 60 Ga. 218, 221; Civil Code, § 5014. Where an action in a justice’s court is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thompson v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  2. Johnson v. KlassettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  3. Abrams v. LangSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
  4. Patterson v. SamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  5. Puffer Manufacturing Co. v. RiversCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chappell v. F. A. D. Andrea Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  2. Brantley-Groover Hardware Co. v. IveySupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  3. Callier v. TrussellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  4. Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API