Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Lifschitz
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 18, 1944PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBenvenga, J.
Action in equity for the specific performance of an agreement for the sale of a stock of liquor or, in the alternative, for damages.
*576The agreement was entered into September 20,1943, between plaintiff, the holder of a retail liquor license, and defendants, whose license had been revoked, Under the agreement, plaintiff agreed to pay the invoice price, plus other charges. The sale was subject to a lien and was scheduled to close at the office of the lienor. A few hours before the time set for closing', defendants notified the broker that they would not sell the liquor, unless plaintiff paid the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Riggs v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Wakeman v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- People v. SchmidtNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Broadway Photoplay Co. v. . World Film Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Murarka v. Bachrack Bros., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- Bogardus v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- Bausch & Lomb Inc. v. Sonomed Technology, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1992
- United States Naval Institute v. Charter Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Buyer v. Mercury Technical Cloth & Felt Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.