Legal Opinion

Department of Housing & Community Development v. Hoffman

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 22, 2006No. 1785Published

1Opinion of the Court

KRAUSER, Judge.

Arthur Hoffman, appellee, was employed as an real estate appraiser by the Maryland Department of Housing and Community Development (“the Department”), appellant. That employment ended when the Department learned from a recent decision of this Court, Hoffman v. Stamper, 155 Md. App. 247, 843 A.2d 153 (2004) (Hoffman I),1 that Hoffman had participated in a “flipping”2 scheme, before he joined the Department. The scheme involved fraud and conspiracy to defraud, as well as violations of the Consumer Protection Act3 and “ethical codes and uniform standards governing appraisers.” Id.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Crum & Forster Managers Corp. v. Resolution Trust Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Bulluck v. Pelham Wood ApartmentsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. Hoffman v. StamperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Dickinson-Tidewater, Inc. v. Supervisor of AssessmentsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  5. Western Correctional Institution v. GeigerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API