Legal Opinion

Menzel v. Metrolina Anesthesia Associates, P.A.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 17, 1984No. 8226SC1207PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Chief Judge.

Defendant contends that the trial court erred by denying its motion for a directed verdict made at the close of all the evidence. A motion for a directed verdict is proper only in a jury trial; the proper motion in a nonjury trial is one for involuntary dismissal under Rule 41(b). Bryant v. Kelly, 10 N.C. App. 208, 178 S.E. 2d 113 (1970), reversed and remanded, 279 N.C. 123, 181 S.E. 2d 438 (1971). Accordingly, we will treat defendant’s motion as one for involuntary dismissal.

Rule 41(b) provides for a motion for dismissal at the close of plaintiffs evidence; it does not…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Coble v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Williams v. Pilot Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. O'Grady v. First Union National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Helms v. ReaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Bryant v. KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ausley v. BishopCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Budd Tire Corp. v. Pierce Tire Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Elliott v. Enka-Candler Fire & Rescue Department, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. All West Pet Supply Co. v. Hill's Pet Products DivisionDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API