Legal Opinion
Blydenburgh v. Cotheal
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 15, 1851PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Bronson, Ch. J.
As a general rule the court does not inquire into the fractions of a day, except for the purpose of guarding against injustice (Small vs. McChesney, 3 Cow. 19; Clute vs. Clute, 3 Denio, 263). We think that a sufficient answer to this motion. Motion denied.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Clute v. CluteNew York Supreme Court · 1846
- Small v. M'ChesneyNew York Supreme Court · 1824
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ganz v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.New York Supreme Court · 1894