Legal Opinion

Matter of Discipline of Casby

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 10, 1984No. C1-83-863PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The above-entitled matter comes before this court upon the stipulation of the parties which provides as follows:

WHEREAS, the Supreme Court has affirmed the misdemeanor conviction of respondent Camelia J. Casby, State v. Casby, 348 N.W.2d 736 (Minn.1984),

WHEREAS, respondent has concluded it is in her best interest to enter into this stipulation,

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the undersigned as follows:

1. Respondent understands that she has certain rights pursuant to Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility, (RLPR). She waives these rights,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. CasbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. RohrbackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  2. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. RohrbackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API