Legal Opinion

In re the Probate of the Will of Dix

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided January 22, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maurice D. Isenbergh, S.

The objectant pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice moved for summary judgment. The motion may be properly brought in Surrogate’s Court (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 316; Matter of Pascal, 309 N. Y. 108; Matter of Fishkind, 271 App. Div. 1013; Matter of Doepfer, 14 Misc 2d 898).

A preliminary examination of the three subscribing witnesses to the will was held in open court. The examination consisting of questions and answers was taken down in full by the official court stenographer. At that time Mr. Potts, one of the three subscribing witnesses, signed a formal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Probate of the Will of PascalNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. In re the Estate of DoepferNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Simon v. PottsNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  2. In re the Estate of RossNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API