Legal Opinion

½ Price Checks Cashed v. United Automobile Insurance Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 2011No. 10-0434PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Guzman

Article 3 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) 1 establishes a comprehensive scheme governing the procedures, liabilities, and remedies pertaining to negotiable instruments, including checks. 2 As part of that scheme, when a bank dishonors a check, the drawer 3 of the check is obligated to pay the amount of the check to the check’s holder 4 according to its terms at the time it was issued. Tex. Bus. & Com. Code § 3.414(b). 5 Neither section 3.414, nor any other provision of the UCC, provides for the recovery of attorney’s fees in those circumstances. But a general statute for civil suits —…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Tony Gullo Motors I, L.P. and Brien Garcia v. Nury ChapaTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P. v. National Development & Research Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Jones v. KelleyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Van Zandt v. Fort Worth PressTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Goodman v. SimondsSupreme Court of the United States · 1858

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Shields Ltd. Partnership v. BradberryTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  3. In re Nalle Plastics Family Ltd. PartnershipTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Wayne Ventling v. Patricia M. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  5. lan/stv, a Joint Venture of Lockwood, Andrews & Newman, Inc. and Stv Incorporated v. Martin K. Eby Construction Company, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2014

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API