Dove v. North Carolina Board of Alcoholic Control
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BROCK, Chief Judge.
Respondent Board of Alcoholic Control contends that the actions of Gerald Brown in selling heroin to Agent Price are imputed to petitioners for the purposes of this proceeding. Respondent contends, and petitioners concede, that on the night of 5 August 1975 Gerald Brown was an employee of petitioners under the Malt Beverage Regulations of the Board of Alcoholic Control. The Board argues that because Brown is an employee, his actions are legally imputed to petitioners and that, therefore, the trial court erred in concluding that petitioners did not “knowingly allow” the use…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Underwood v. State Board of Alcoholic ControlSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Boyd v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Bruce v. State Board of Alcoholic ControlCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976