Legal Opinion

Utah Power & Light Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 4, 1917No. Nos. 4506, 4507PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the District Court oí the United States for the District of Utah; J. A. Marshall, Judge. On application by each party for rehearing or modification of opinion.

1Per curiam

November 24, 1915, we filed our opinion in the above-entitled causes (230 Fed. 342, 144 C. C. A. 484), wherein, upon the cross-appeal of the United States, we said:

“It remains to consider the contention of the government upon its cross-appeal, viz. that the courts should have decreed an accounting and damages as prayed. We are unable to perceive why that contention is not sound, and this notwithstanding the lands have not been injured and would not, perhaps, have been otherwise leased or used by the government during the same period. United States v. Bernard (C. C. A.) 202 Fed. 728-731, 121…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. St. Louis v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. United States v. BernardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. BatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Turner v. KirkwoodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API