Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 29, 2011No. AC 32101PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BISHOP, J.

The respondent, the commissioner of correction, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court granting, in part, the revised amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by the petitioner, Francis Anderson. The respondent claims that the court improperly determined that the petitioner was deprived of the effective assistance of trial counsel due to a conflict of interest. We agree and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the habeas court.

The following procedural history is relevant to our resolution of the respondent’s claim. In the underlying criminal matters, the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Nix v. WhitesideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Lavelle Lonelle McKinleySupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  2. Rodriguez v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  3. Burgos-Torres v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  4. People v. GarnerColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Anderson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API