Legal Opinion

Smith v. Rosenthal Toyota, Inc.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 11, 1990No. 1358, September Term, 1989PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILNER, Judge.

James and Carolyn Smith sued Rosenthal Toyota, Inc. in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County for fraud and for conversion of a 1981 Chevette that was owned by them. They appeal from the entry of summary judgment in favor of Rosenthal.

On July 10, 1987, after dropping his wife off at work, Mr. Smith stopped at the Rosenthal showroom to look at some trucks. He was driving the Chevette, which was titled in his name and his wife’s jointly. He found a truck that he liked but told the salesman, one Willie McAllister, that he generally did not buy anything without his wife’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Martens Chevrolet, Inc. v. SeneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  2. Hamilton v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. Beall v. BeallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  4. Everett v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  5. Interstate Insurance Co. v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Parker v. Columbia BankCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. First Union National Bank v. Steele Software Systems Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. Greenberg v. TomlinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. DiLeo v. NugentCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  5. Ford v. Antwerpen Motorcars Ltd.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API