Legal Opinion
United States v. Eisenberg
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 15, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2013-1629PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge
The United States initiated this suit to recover funds under Section 8132 of the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act (“FECA”), 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq., from defendant Michael D.J. Eisenberg, who is an attorney licensed to practice law in the District of Columbia and is proceeding pro se in this action. Eisenberg successfully obtained a settlement award for his former client, and now-third-party defendant, Gregory Thompson, in a lawsuit captioned, Thompson v. Wackenhut Corp., No. 1:09-cv-01113-GBL-TRJ (E.D.Va. Oct. 2, 2009)…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tolan v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ofisi v. BNP Paribas, S.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Champlain Parkway SW Discharge Permit - Decision on MotionsVermont Superior Court · 2019
- Headfirst Baseball LLC v. ElwoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 651 v. PhilbeckDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2020
- Richards v. GelsominoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019