In re Phillips
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) Board of Appeals (“board”) which affirmed the examiner’s rejections of claims 1-171 under 35 U.S.C. § 101 as nonstatutory subject matter and under 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph, for lack of an enabling disclosure. We reverse.
BACKGROUND
Invention
The invention relates to computer apparatus and process for preparing a complete set of printed architectural specifications, which describe the various materials and techniques used in constructing a building. Because to a considerable extent such specifications…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gottschalk v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Parker v. FlookSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Dann v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- In re FreemanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
- In re ChatfieldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1983
- In re WalterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980
- Diamond v. DiehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Diamond v. DiehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1981