Legal Opinion

Merchants' Mutual Insurance v. Hill

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 1885PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the' St. Louis Circuit Court, Hobneb, J.

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This is a proceeding by scire facias to revive a judgment. Two questions arise upon the record. 1. Whether a writ of scire facias to revive a judgment is properly executed so as to give the court jurisdiction to proceed, (by reading the writ to the defendant without delivering (him a copy of the petition. 2. Whether a scire facias lies to revive a judgment from which an appeal has been prosecuted with a supersedeas bond, which appeal is still pending.

*591I. Upon the first question we are of opinion that ■the service was sufficient. The case of Andrews v. Buckbee (77 Mo. 428), to which we are…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Andrews v. BuckbeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lafayette County v. WonderlyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  2. Wormington v. City of MonettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  3. Bick v. VaughnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Meyer v. RagarMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Armstrong v. CrooksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API